Search
Home Profile Blog Portfolio Research Books Gallery Videos Contact
SpaceGaps

Writing  ·  Research  ·  Ideas

← Papers
Policy

Why Americans Pay Billions for Olympic Access While the World Watches Free

Admin · · 2 min read
The United States stands alone among developed nations in denying free Olympic access to its citizens. For Paris 2024, NBC paid $1.45 billion for exclusive U.S. rights—four times what all 49 European countries paid combined. Yet this massive investment reached just 30.6 million Americans (9% of the population), while Europe's modest $350 million reached 215 million viewers (33% of the population). The math is brutal: Americans paid $47 per viewer; Europeans paid $1.63. We paid eight times more per capita than Europeans, and twenty-nine times more per viewer. NBC made $450 million in profit while locking 90% of Americans out of Olympic coverage. This isn't just about money—it's about national identity. The Olympics represent one of the last truly shared American experiences, transcending political and cultural divides. In an era of unprecedented polarization, Olympic competition offers rare common ground: we all root for Team USA. But this only works if everyone can watch. The current model prioritizes NBC's quarterly profits over civic engagement. Meanwhile, American taxpayers fund Olympic athlete training through the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee. We pay to develop these athletes, then pay again to watch them compete—or more often, we simply don't watch at all. There's a better way. At $400 million per Olympics—matching Europe's per-capita contribution—the U.S. government could secure free broadcast rights for all Americans. That's $200 million annually, or 0.003% of the federal budget. Less than sixty cents per American per year. The 2028 Los Angeles Olympics offer a perfect opportunity for reform. Los Angeles will host the world, showcasing American athletes on American soil. It would be unconscionable if millions of Americans—including Angelenos themselves—cannot watch because they lack a Peacock subscription. Three solutions exist: public broadcasting (PBS negotiates free rights), hybrid public-private (government pays for basic coverage, NBC sells premium), or regulatory mandate (require rights holders to provide substantial free access). Each would serve Americans better than the status quo. The choice is simple: Do we value NBC's profits, or do we value every American's ability to participate in a rare moment of collective national pride?

Related Papers

Policy

Nation Builders, Maintainers, and Destroyers

The fate of nations is not random. It is not luck, geography, or historical accident alone. It is the product of which of these three forces dominates — and whether the society's institutions, culture, and policies enable or suppress each one. You can diagnose any nation's trajectory by asking one question: who is winning?

· 2 min read
Theology

The Forgiveness Paradox: The Moral Hazard in Religious Absolution Systems

This essay examines how institutional mechanisms for periodic sin absolution create moral hazard that has enabled large-scale religious violence. Catholic confession, Islamic martyrdom theology, and related structures provide predictable pathways from transgression to forgiveness, systematically reducing the psychological costs of violence. When combined with divine authorization, these mechanisms transform killing from sin into religious duty. Through analysis of the Crusades, Inquisition, colonial conquest, and contemporary terrorism, the essay argues that specific institutional structures—not entire religions—enable sustained violence. Protestant reformation's elimination of priestly absolution demonstrates how removing such mechanisms alters patterns, though violence continues through different justifications. Understanding these structures enables targeted reform without condemning entire faith traditions.

· 3 min read
Philosophy

A BRIEF SURVEY OF TIME: HUMANKIND AND GOD

This paper explores the fundamental tension between human temporal experience and divine eternity. Humans perceive time as linear, measurable, and subjective—shaped by memory, culture, and technology. In contrast, theological traditions conceive God as existing outside temporal succession, perceiving all moments simultaneously in an eternal present. The paper examines how temporal beings relate to a timeless God, addressing paradoxes of divine foreknowledge, freedom, and relationality. By synthesizing human and divine perspectives on time, it illuminates profound questions about meaning, mortality, and purpose, arguing that life's significance emerges at the intersection of the temporal and eternal.

· 3 min read