Home Blog Portfolio Papers Gallery Books Videos Profile Contact
SpaceGaps

Writing  ·  Research  ·  Ideas

← Papers

Nation Builders, Maintainers, and Destroyers

Admin · · 2 min read
Every society at every moment in history contains three categories of citizens and institutions: Builders, who generate net positive value and compound it across time; Maintainers, who preserve and transmit accumulated civilisational value across generations; and Destroyers, who consume more than they create and leave institutions, communities, and social capital diminished in their wake. The relative proportion of each category — and, more critically, which category a given society's institutions, incentives, and culture reward — determines whether that society thrives, endures, or declines. This paper argues that Western democracies are currently experiencing a dangerous shift in this balance. The institutional, cultural, and policy environments that historically produced and protected Builders are under pressure. The Maintainer role — the load-bearing structure of every durable civilisation — is systematically devalued. And Destroyers, at every level from the individual to the institutional, are operating with a confidence and impunity that the architects of liberal democratic order could not have anticipated. The argument is both diagnostic and prescriptive. Drawing on evidence from social capital research, institutional trust surveys, economic mobility data, mental health trends, and comparative national case studies, this paper identifies the mechanisms driving the shift and proposes a framework for policy intervention. The goal is not to assign moral blame but to identify structural conditions — and structural remedies. Societies do not usually collapse. They degrade, gradually and then irreversibly. The question for democratic governments is whether they still possess the institutional capacity and the political will to reverse a trajectory that is, as yet, correctable.

References

1. See, for example, Shane Harris et al., “Road to War: U.S. Struggled to Convince Allies, and Zelensky, of Risk of Invasion,” Washington Post, August 16, 2022; Erin Banco et al., “ ‘Something Was Badly Wrong’: When Washington Realized Russia Was Actually Invading Ukraine,” Politico, February 24, 2023; and Susan Glasser, “Trial by Combat: Jake Sullivan and the White House’s Battle to Keep Ukraine in the Fight,” New Yorker, October 9, 2023.
2. Ellen Nakashima and Ashley Parker, “Inside the White House Preparations for a Russian Invasion,” Washington Post, February 14, 2022.
3. Joseph R. Biden, “Why America Must Lead Again: Rescuing American Foreign Policy after Trump,” Foreign Affairs, January 23, 2020.
4. US Department of State, “On the Extension of the New START Treaty with the Russian Federation,” press release, February 3, 2021, https://www.state.gov/on-the-extension-of-the-new-start-treaty-with-the-russian-federation/.
5. Trevor Hunnicutt, Arshad Mohammed, and Andrew Osborn, “U.S. Imposes Wide Array of Sanctions on Russia for ‘Malign’ Actions,” Reuters, April 15, 2021, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-imposes-wide-array-sanctions-russia-malign-actions-2021-04-15/.
6. Harris et al., “Road to War.”
7. Interview with Mark Milley in Banco et al., “ ‘Something Was Badly Wrong.’ ”
8. Vladimir Putin, “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians,” Presidential Administration of Russia, July 12, 2021, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181.
9. Peter Feaver and William Inboden, “A Strategic Planning Cell on National Security at the White House,” in Avoiding Trivia: The Role of Strategic Planning in American Foreign Policy, ed. Daniel W. Drezner (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2009), 98–109.
10. Kathleen Carroll, “A Tiger Team Plans for the War in Ukraine,” Carnegie Corporation of New York, July 14, 2023, https://www.carnegie.org/our-work/article/how-scholarship-can-inform-foreign-policy-better-outcomes/.

Related Papers

The Forgiveness Paradox: The Moral Hazard in Religious Absolution Systems

This essay examines how institutional mechanisms for periodic sin absolution create moral hazard that has enabled large-scale religious violence. Catholic confession, Islamic martyrdom theology, and related structures provide predictable pathways from transgression to forgiveness, systematically reducing the psychological costs of violence. When combined with divine authorization, these mechanisms transform killing from sin into religious duty. Through analysis of the Crusades, Inquisition, colonial conquest, and contemporary terrorism, the essay argues that specific institutional structures—not entire religions—enable sustained violence. Protestant reformation's elimination of priestly absolution demonstrates how removing such mechanisms alters patterns, though violence continues through different justifications. Understanding these structures enables targeted reform without condemning entire faith traditions.

· 3 min read

A BRIEF SURVEY OF TIME: HUMANKIND AND GOD

This paper explores the fundamental tension between human temporal experience and divine eternity. Humans perceive time as linear, measurable, and subjective—shaped by memory, culture, and technology. In contrast, theological traditions conceive God as existing outside temporal succession, perceiving all moments simultaneously in an eternal present. The paper examines how temporal beings relate to a timeless God, addressing paradoxes of divine foreknowledge, freedom, and relationality. By synthesizing human and divine perspectives on time, it illuminates profound questions about meaning, mortality, and purpose, arguing that life's significance emerges at the intersection of the temporal and eternal.

· 3 min read

Why Americans Pay Billions for Olympic Access While the World Watches Free

Americans pay $1.45 billion for Olympic broadcast rights—four times more than all of Europe—yet only 9% of the U.S. population watches, compared to 33% of Europeans who get free access. While every other developed nation treats Olympic coverage as a public right, Americans must subscribe to Peacock to watch their athletes compete. NBC profits $450 million while 90% of Americans are locked out of one of our last shared national experiences. At just $400 million per Olympics, the U.S. could provide universal free access—less than we currently pay through inflated subscription costs. It's time for reform.

· 2 min read