The question
That is the question I asked to a local community – that do not belong to the “people of the book”. i.e Christians, Jews and Muslims. Christians, Jews and Muslims are called so, because, from the young age, they are taught that life has to be lived according to the ‘book’. The ‘book’ defines who you are, what defines good or bad, and how to generally interact with other worldviews. When I first read the book of Proverbs – I was astounded. I was thinking… these Christians must be the smartest people in the world. They have had this book all their lives – which tells them what to do in all circumstances, generally. Warnings against the bad, encouragements towards the good. What to lift up. What to look down upon. What could go wrong. Or so I thought. Plenty could still go wrong.
But, if plenty could wrong, for Christians, even after relying on a source in intelligence and reason, what about the people who don’t have this resource, if you consider it that. What about them, or about me, before I came to Christ. I thought back, and posed to friends, who don’t have this resource. I made no attempts to sway answers one way or the other.
I present their paraphrased answers in the left column with its contextual interpretation to the right.
Paraphrased answers
| # | Paraphrased Answer | Contextual Interpretation / Intended Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ethics and morals are shaped by parental influence, individual personality, and inherited traits that may extend beyond immediate parents. | Emphasizes biological inheritance and temperament, suggesting moral tendencies may be partially genetic and not entirely learned. |
| 2 | Ethics and meaning arise from the combined influence of family, religious exposure, formal education, and social environment. | Represents a socialization model in which moral frameworks are constructed through multiple formative institutions. |
| 3 | Moral values are primarily derived from family upbringing and early life conditioning. | Places primary moral authority within the household and early developmental environment. |
| 4 | Life experiences, particularly hardship and suffering, shape one’s ethical outlook and sense of meaning. | Views ethics as experiential, formed through adversity rather than inherited systems. |
| 5 | Moral decisions are guided by what appears most rational and happiness-producing, especially concerning children. | Reflects a pragmatic or utilitarian ethic prioritizing perceived family well-being. |
| 6 | Ethics and morals are the result of values intentionally instilled by parents. | Emphasizes deliberate moral instruction rather than passive cultural absorption. |
| 7 | There are no objective or universal moral standards from which ethics can be derived. | Represents moral relativism or nihilism, rejecting transcendent moral foundations. |
| 8 | Ethics and meaning emerge from the interaction of genetics, environment, and personal development. | Aligns with a biopsychosocial or behavioral science framework. |
| 9 | Ethics and morals are tied to the survival, identity, and destiny of one’s kinship group or clan. | Reflects a collectivist or tribal ethic centered on group continuity. |
| 10 | Although high moral ideals exist in theory, practical life renders most values irrelevant. | Expresses a cynical or disillusioned worldview shaped by perceived moral futility. |
| 11 | Ethics and meaning are derived from culture, religion, belief in God, and philosophical reflection. | Represents a plural-source worldview integrating spiritual and intellectual traditions. |
| 12 | Moral understanding emerges from scripture, family, community, spiritual traditions, and lived experience. | Reflects an integrative framework combining tradition, reason, and experience. |
| 13 | Ethics and meaning arise from biology, family, geography, survival needs, history, narrative, and religion. | Represents a civilizational and evolutionary view of morality. |
| 14 | The meaning of life is fundamentally about survival amid disorder and uncertainty. | Expresses a minimalist existential outlook focused on endurance. |
| 15 | Ethics and meaning are derived from engagement with classical literature and philosophy. | Centers moral formation in the accumulated wisdom of the humanities. |
Across these responses, several implicit patterns emerge:
-
Most respondents ground ethics in inheritance, environment, or experience, not in objective or transcendent sources.
-
Several answers collapse ethics into survival or happiness, rather than truth or obligation.
-
Only a minority explicitly reference God, Scripture, or metaphysical foundations.
-
Many answers reveal unexamined assumptions, rather than articulated moral systems.
Collectively, the responses suggest that ethics, morals, destiny, and meaning are widely perceived as emergent properties of life circumstances, rather than as realities grounded in objective or transcendent truth claims. The data reflects a shift from foundational ethics toward contextual ethics—where meaning is assembled from influences rather than derived from first principles. There is absolutely no reliance on classical philosophical ethics (Aristotelian, Kantian, natural law) or greek mythology. I only had to smile.
